The iPhone 16 Pro can take stunning images in any conditions and that’s to say nothing of its neat 4K slow motion mode. Its multiple rear lenses and new Photographic Styles offer a lot for photographers, whether they’re just starting out or if they’ve been taking photos for years. The iPhone 16 Pro even put up a strong fight against the other best camera phones around, including the Galaxy S24 Ultra, the Pixel 9 Pro and the Xiaomi 14 Ultra.
Read more: iPhone 16 Pro takes on Xiaomi 14 Ultra
But it’s still not the perfect camera and while early reports from industry insiders claim that the phone’s video skills will get a boost, there’s more the phone will need to be an all-round photography powerhouse. As both an experienced phone reviewer and a professional photographer, I have exceptionally high expectations for top-end phone cameras and having used the iPhone 16 Pro since its launch, I have some thoughts on what needs to change.
Here are the main points I want to see improved on the iPhone 17 when it likely launches in September 2025.
Larger image sensor
Though the 1/1.28-inch sensor found on the iPhone 16 Pro’s main camera is already a good size — and marginally larger than the S24 Ultra’s 1/1.33-inch sensor — I want to see Apple go bigger. A larger image sensor can capture more light and offer better dynamic range. It’s why pro cameras tend to have at least “full frame” image sensors, while really high-end cameras, like the amazing Hasselblad 907X, have enormous “medium format” sensors for pristine image quality.
Even on pro cameras, sensor size is important. Even the full-frame image sensor in the middle is dwarfed by the medium format sensor on the right. Phone camera sensors don’t come anywhere near to this size.
Xiaomi understands this, equipping its 14 Ultra with a 1-inch type sensor. It’s larger than the sensors found on almost any other phone, which allows the 14 Ultra to take stunning photos in a variety of conditions — including Taylor Swift concerts. I’m keen to see Apple at least match Xiaomi’s phone here with a similar 1-inch type sensor. Though if we’re talking pie-in-the-sky wishes, maybe the iPhone 17 could be the first smartphone with a full-frame image sensor. I won’t hold my breath on that one — the phone, and the lenses, would need to be immense to accommodate it, so it’d likely be more efficient just to let you make calls with your mirrorless camera.
Variable aperture
Speaking of the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, one of the other reasons that phone rocks so hard for photography is its variable aperture on the main camera. Its widest aperture is f/1.6 — significantly wider than the f/1.78 of the iPhone 16 Pro.That wider aperture lets in a lot of light in dim conditions and more authentically achieves out-of-focus bokeh around a subject.
The streetlight outside this pub has been turned into an attractive starburst thanks to the variable aperture of the Xiaomi 14 Ultra.
But Xiaomi’s 14 Ultraaperture can also close down to f/4, and with that narrower aperture, it’s able to create starbursts around points of light. I love achieving this effect in nighttime imagery with the phone. It makes the resulting images look much more like they’ve been taken with a professional camera and lens, while the same points of light on the iPhone just look like roundish blobs. Disappointingly, Xiaomi actually removed this feature from the new 15 Ultra so whether Apple sees value in implementing this kind of technology remains to be seen.
More Photographic Styles
Though Apple has had various styles and effects integrated into the iPhone’s cameras, the iPhone 16 range took it further, with more control over the effects and more toning options. It’s enough that CNET Senior Editor Lisa Eadicicco even declared the new Photographic Styles her “favorite new feature on Apple’s latest phone.”
I think they’re great too. Or rather, they’re a great start. The different color tones, like the ones you get with the Amber and Gold styles, add some lovely warmth to scenes, and the Quiet effect adds a vintage filmic fade, but there’s still not a whole lot to choose from and the interface can be a little slow to work through. I’d love to see Apple introduce more Photographic Styles with different color toning options, or even with tones that mimic vintage film stocks from Kodak or Fujifilm.
I like the warmer tones produced by the iPhone’s Amber style in this image, but I’d definitely like to see more options for getting creative with color tones.
And sure, there are plenty of third-party apps like VSCO or Snapseed that let you play around with color filters all you want. But using Apple’s styles means you can take your images with the look already applied, and then change it afterward if you don’t like it — nothing is hard-baked into your image.
Better ProRaw integration with Photographic Styles
I do think Apple has slightly missed an opportunity with its Photographic Styles, though, in that you can use them only when taking images in HEIF (high-efficiency image format). Unfortunately, you can’t use them when shooting in ProRaw. I love Apple’s use of ProRaw on previous iPhones, as it takes advantage of all of the iPhone’s computational photography — including things like HDR image blending — but still outputs a DNG raw file for easier editing.
The DNG file typically also offers more latitude to brighten dark areas or tone down highlights in an image, making it extremely versatile. Previously, Apple’s color presets could be used when shooting in ProRaw, and I loved it. I frequently shot street-style photos using the high contrast black-and-white mode and then edited the raw file further.
I do a lot of street photography in black and white, and I’d love more flexibility to take ProRaw shots in monochrome.
Now using that same black-and-white look means only shooting images in HEIF format, eliminating the benefits of using Apple’s ProRaw. Oddly, while the older-style “Filters” are no longer available in the camera app when taking a raw image, you can still apply those filters to raw photos in the iPhone’s gallery app through the editing menu.
LUTs for ProRes video
And while we’re on the topic of color presets and filters, Apple needs to bring those to video, too. On the iPhone 15 Pro, Apple introduced the ability to shoot video in ProRes, which results in very low-contrast, almost gray-looking footage. The idea is that video editors will take this raw footage and then apply their edits on top, often applying contrast and color presets known as LUTs (look-up tables) that gives footage a particular look — think dark and blue for horror films or warm and light tones for a romantic drama vibe.
But Apple doesn’t offer any kind of LUT for editing ProRes video on the iPhone, beyond simply ramping up the contrast, which doesn’t really do the job properly. Sure, the point of ProRes is that you would take that footage off the iPhone, put it into software like Davinci Resolve, and then properly color grade the footage so it looks sleek and professional.
ProRes footage looks very low contrast and desaturated. Apple needs to introduce ways to help you do more with ProRes files on the iPhone.
But that still leaves the files on your phone, and I’d love to be able to do more with them. My gallery is littered with ungraded video files that I’ll do very little with because they need color grading externally. I’d love to share them to Instagram, or with my family over WhatsApp, after transforming those files from drab and gray to beautifully colorful.
With the iPhone 17, or even with the iPhone 16 as a software update, I want to see Apple creating a range of its own LUTs that can be directly applied to ProRes video files on the iPhone.
If Apple were able to implement all these changes — excluding, perhaps, the full-frame sensor which even I can admit is a touch ambitious — it would have an absolute beast of a camera on its hands.
